Friday, February 29, 2008
Lord of the Flies Trial Reflection
I did a superb job in court, and I am confident I was a big part in proving Jack innocent. I believe this because when I was researching my case, I found a whole bunch of evidence that would help prove Jack not guilty. One piece of evidence I found was, when Simon was murdered, the type of weather, and what Jack’s intentions were. Since it was raining and thundering, it was really hard to tell who it was coming out of the forest. Also, Jack thought it was the beast, so he was actually protecting his tribe, and that’s one of the pieces that helped me with the trial. Another piece of evidence that helped me win the case was about Piggy’s murder. Jack never told Roger to pull the lever, nor did Roger believe that he should’ve pulled the lever because he knew Jack wanted him to, or just because of Jack’s hatred of Piggy. Roger pulled the lever because of delirious abandonment, which was a quote in the book that means he was so full of excitement, he abandoned his position, and accidently forced his weight onto the lever. The reason these pieces of evidence are important because, with these pieces, you can’t prove Jack guilty, because these pieces prove that he wasn’t part of the death of Piggy, and he had no intention of killing Simon, but intention of killing the beast, and protecting his tribe. In conclusion, I believe that I deserve an A because of the very important pieces of evidence I found, and how I presented them. Additionally, I believe I was organized, and wearing proper attire for the event (and I had a suitcase!).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment